case study:
DSB

What creates personal comfort during travel, beyond seating?

challenge

DSB needed to know when passengers feel good on the train so they could better develop and refine their products and services. How do users carve out spaces of personal comfort on the train?

approach

We left behind our woolly socks and steaming mugs of tea, and set out to understand what comfort means in the context of a train. We sped across Denmark on local and long-distance trains with our respondents to observe and understand their experiences.

result

We defined parameters of comfort and DSB received a catalogue of recommendations to enhance the experience of passengers on the train, and consequently improve customer satisfaction levels.

scroll down arrow

We found two primary factors of comfort: predictability & personal space

the challenge

The type of train sets traveller expectations

Comfort means something different depending on whether you are travelling for leisure, business, or are just on your daily commute. We studied the needs of the three user groups seeking overall similarities and group specific requirements.

In general, we found passengers’ responses fell into two categories of personal comfort: one as a function of predictability and the other of personal space. If both of these were taken care of, passengers were able to direct their mental energy elsewhere, and could have a more comfortable journey.

We also discovered seasoned passengers set expectations for their journeys based on the type of train itself; when it comes to comfort the IC-32 is a clear favourite and sets the benchmark for all other journeys, whereas the double decker train is perceived as noisy and the worst of the lot. An understanding of the overall factors gave a clear indication to DSB of where they should concentrate their efforts.

the approach

We conducted participant observation sessions among the three user groups, and mapped underlying tensions and contradictions.

Passengers craved personal space, but enjoyed the social aspect of being on a train. We evaluated the quality of DSB’s visual communication of appropriate behavior, such as the signalling of silent zones or seat division lines.

”IS IT A BIRD’s analysis of personal comfort has sharpened our view of how the customers experience the train journey, and it has provided inspiring input for how we can work with improving the experience going forward.”
Henriette Friberg, Analysis Consultant, DSB
The Result

We created and prioritised interventions that could support and enhance customer satisfaction and increase levels of personal comfort across four touch points: on the train, on the platform, through the staff, and in the communication of time. We highlighted quick wins such as installing more power outlets and fold out tables.

On a more managerial level we recommended passengers be allowed to choose the intent of their journey as either leisure or business at the time of booking, giving DSB the chance to group like-minded passengers together and control the vibe of the train.Training staff to be ambassadors and mediators of conflict would also improve the passengers’ confidence in DSB.

2012

When is communication on time changes experienced as meaningful to passengers?

Explorative research and development of recommendations on how to communicate time, in order to make information concerning delays meaningful to passengers travelling by s-tog.

2013

What creates personel comfort during travel, beyond seating?

We defined parameters of comfort, and DSB received a catalogue of recommendations to enhance the experience of passengers on the train, and consequently improve customer satisfaction levels.

2014

What makes a soundless tv-format on public trams entertaining?

We explored how passengers percieved and used the roof mounted screens in the S-tog, to devlop inspiring recommendations and concepts for future entertainment formats.

2014

What makes traveling by train a safer experience?

We identified multiply factors influencing the travel experience in a safe or unsafe direction, and created recommendations for a range of initiatives to support a safer environment at platforms and in trains.

2015

How do you attract the right employees?

We developed recommendations to improve a recruitment platform and materials, by gaining insights from six types of employees at different organisational levels.

2015

When is dirt dirty?

We identified crucial factors threatening the customer experience of cleanliness and comfort on board trains and in stations. The more nuanced understanding empowered DSB to take action in areas that affect theover all customer experience.

2016

What makes train travel a premium experience?

We travelled along with passengers on DSB 1’ to help define their expectations towards a premium service offer, and developed recommendation for the future competitive service concept.

2019

How can we define our customers journeys to design better traveling experiences?

We strengthened the CX-teams internal capacity in researcing, defining and developing customer journey maps, providing them new tools, mindsets and a framework to continue exploring new journeys.

Interested to find out more? Contact the

DSB

case owner

Louise Vang Jensen
Co-CEO & Partner
louise@isitabird.dk+45 71 74 16 76